Search for: "Duke et al v. Lee et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
Thus, for instance, Epstein et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:34 pm
John Lee Jackson, Esq., et al., No. 7:18-cv-02206 (D.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
As usual, Orwell has it right; Bollinger et al. have it wrong. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
"Once again: Tyson does not challenge in any way the data that Arcidiacono, et al., presented, that black students at Duke disproportionately migrate away from more difficult (science and engineering) to easier (liberal arts) majors. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Windy City Innovations, LLC, Nos. 2018-1400 et al. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
We affirm.In Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm
Hollaar; and from Intel, et al.: “At the time of the Constitution’s adoption, there was no established rule that only courts could invalidate patents. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:20 am
Rev. 1833-1893 (2010).TRANSNATIONAL WATERWAYS.McKinney, Matthew, et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
20 Duke J. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Lee J held that the although the publisher believed publication of the matter was in the public interest, the belief was not reasonable in the circumstances [384]. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
” He also said questions had been raised about why “three or four associates of the Duke of Sussex” had not given evidence in the case against MGN. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Quebecor Media Inc. et al, 2022 ONSC 3749. [read post]
